| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
41. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Leonard Kersey wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Paul Leonard Kersey wrote: CCP ruins gameplay again, this is not news. Any other company that screwed it's customers repeatedly like this soon went out of business. Start firing some...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 23:15:00
|
42. Goon tears are BEST tears! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It was a good article but a missed opportunity. I am glad to see that they know it was a mistake and not a conspiracy. However, It was a huge missed opportunity to say how screwed up it is to call for someones real life job over a video game. An...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 21:39:00
|
43. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Leonard Kersey wrote: CCP ruins gameplay again, this is not news. Any other company that screwed it's customers repeatedly like this soon went out of business. Start firing some of these fat fingered "DEVS", maybe the others will actuall...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 21:16:00
|
44. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Beidorion eldwardan wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Some of the responses in this thread and the other one are DISGUSTING. And absolutely uncalled for. Was it a terrible accident? YES Does it need a fully documented investigation? YES Sho...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 11:45:00
|
45. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Because I know the difference between real life and a video game?
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 11:28:00
|
46. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ito kazami wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Its a ******* game. This is not something that affected the stock market. You want a CCP employee punished or even lose his or her job over a mistake likely made while excited over a battle happe...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 11:11:00
|
47. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cyrenna Goran wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Some of the responses in this thread and the other one are DISGUSTING. And absolutely uncalled for. Was it a terrible accident? YES Does it need a fully documented investigation? YES Should it...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 11:00:00
|
48. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Harrkonen Dune wrote: ...And by the way if you make a mistake you must be held accountable for that mistake or lessons are never learned.... I expect another bad reply. Its a ******* game. This is not something that affected the stock mark...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 09:55:00
|
49. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Harrkonen Dune wrote: So it now appears that CCP have joined the ranks of the unwashed masses against the CFC, declared war on the home of the useless and the land of the bad. I guess it was only a matter of time, we are fighting everyone else...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 09:28:00
|
50. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Heptameron wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Some of the responses in this thread and the other one are DISGUSTING. And absolutely uncalled for. Get the hell over yourselves. It was a mistake that messed up an historic day in a video game. ...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 09:18:00
|
51. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ezio Dicostanzo wrote: shame on you CCP, you fun killer! we dont care about your sorry ass excuses, just do the f*cking job we pay you for with our subscriptions get your **** together, wtf !!! It was a ******* mistake. If you can't accept...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 09:05:00
|
52. Announcement:Tonight's fleet fight in Z9PP-H - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some of the responses in this thread and the other one are DISGUSTING. And absolutely uncalled for. Was it a terrible accident? YES Does it need a fully documented investigation? YES Should it involve communication with the CSM? YES Should someon...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.05 08:58:00
|
53. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Marcus Harikari wrote: iteron should keep highest cargo space because of those of us who trained gallente indy to 5 to fly iteron5 No It also needs a change. And in my opinion a change to a cargo bay that can not be affected by cargo expa...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.04 20:20:00
|
54. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ersahi Kir wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Its balanced because it can only do that single task as opposed to the general cargo the other ships get. It is sad that some of you just don't get it. They are single task ships. If you are fitt...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.04 06:22:00
|
55. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I personally still think the Iteron V ought to be changed into a poor mans hauler. Separate 25K bay not affected by rigs everything else lower including build costs.
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.04 01:04:00
|
56. CCP- what r you guys thinking towards marauders? not finished stats, just genera... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Just want to again throw it out there. Make the Golem a PVE Aggro attracting ship. That would allow it to be used in more group PVE content.
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.03 23:05:00
|
57. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Its balanced because it can only do that single task as opposed to the general cargo the other ships get. It is sad that some of you just don't get it. They are single task ships. If you are fitting a Bestower to try to compete you are doing it w...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.03 22:58:00
|
58. Tech 2 Transport Ship Role Ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Paikis wrote: Jump Drives! /semi-troll That idea is not a troll. It is in my opinion a good and highly specialized job for the hull. You would not use this ship as a poor mans jump freighter because of the limited cargo, range, and of course...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.03 22:52:00
|
59. Tech 2 Transport Ship Role Ideas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I admit that the idea I had for the prowler was the weaker of the ideas. However I do not believe you have provided any ideas of your own for this craft. As for your opinion of the Crane. Not every situation goes by a FCs spreadsheets and jump p...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.03 07:57:00
|
60. CCP Games Announces Former Electronic Arts Executive Sean Decker as Senior Vice ... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No I seriously hope World of Darkness maintains EVEs type of gameplay and keeps away from Microtransaction as far away as possible. CCP can prove that the pay model of MMOs can still happen other than internet spaceships. And I hope this new hire...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.07.02 23:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |